CONNECTICUT INSURANCE LAW – Homeowners policy did not cover alleged trespass disturbing neighbor

2014-09-16 | Joseph M. Busher
jmbusher@jacksonokeefe.com

Category: Real Estate

Joseph M. Busher

The Superior Court holds that a homeowners policy did not cover an alleged trespass disturbing a neighbor, in the absence of bodily injury or property damage, despite an allegation of reduction in property value by the neighbor.  The policy defined property damage as including “physical injury or destruction of tangible personal property”.  Here the neighbor alleged that the insured threw nails on the neighbors driveway, built a spite fence, pointed security cameras at the neighbor’s windows, broadcast loud music, and made obscene hand gestures.  Edward Jazlowiecki v. Nationwide Ins. Co.  (August 7, 2014)

If you have a possible claim, you will need to review your options timely. For assistance, call the attorneys at Jackson O’Keefe now at (860) 278-4040.

With offices in Southington and Wethersfield, as well as satellite offices in East Haddam, Bloomfield and Farmington, our lawyers strive to meet the needs of area residents, making getting your legal services easier than ever.  Call us now to speak with us about your case.  860 278 4040

Share this:



Latest News

Posted on 7/10/2017


Posted on 7/10/2017


Posted on 7/10/2017


Posted on 7/10/2017


Posted on 7/10/2017


Posted on 7/5/2017


Posted on 7/5/2017


Posted on 5/4/2017


More Articles
best.jpg
Martindale---Hubble.jpg
SUPER-LAWYERS.jpg
BAR-REGISTER.jpg
CLM.jpg
top-attorneys-ct.jpg