ACCIDENT LAW - District Court grants Target's motion for summary judgment based upon inapplicability of mode of operation

2016-03-01 | Joseph M. Busher Jr.
jmbusher@jacksonokeefe.com

Category: Personal Injury & Wrongful Death

Joseph M. Busher Jr.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirms summary judgment for Target.  The plaintiff sued Target alleging negligence in creating or failing to remedy a dangerous condition.  He allegedly slipped and fell on an unknown substance, which was described as an orange liquid.  The fall occurred in the infant clothing area of the store.  Summary judgment was granted for Target.  On appeal, the Second Circuit affirms.  "Target's mode of operation did not give rise to a reasonable risk of injury to customers of the sort experienced by [plaintiff]."  Chaudhry v. Target Corp., 2016 WL 336377 (2d Cir. January 28, 2016)

If you have a possible claim, you will need to review your options timely. For assistance, call the attorneys at Jackson O’Keefe now at (860) 873-2994.

With offices in Southington and Wethersfield, as well as satellite offices in East Haddam, Bloomfield and Farmington, our lawyers strive to meet the needs of area residents, making getting your legal services easier than ever.  Call us now to speak with us about your case.  (860) 873-2994 during business hours or 860.966.7436 any time, or email us any time at info@jacksonokeefe.com

Our East Haddam office: 
Phone: (860) 873-2994
Fax: (860) 527-2500
Address: 51 Dolbia Hill Rd, East Haddam, CT 06420

Share this:



Latest News

More Articles
best.jpg
Martindale---Hubble.jpg
SUPER-LAWYERS.jpg
BAR-REGISTER.jpg
CLM.jpg
top-attorneys-ct.jpg