INSURANCE LAW – CT Supreme Court reaffirms that UM insurer entitled to full credit for amounts received by insured, without apportionment:

2015-02-10 | Joseph M. Busher
jmbusher@jacksonokeefe.com

Category: Insurance

Joseph M. Busher

The insured received $245,000 from two tortfeasors.  The insured had a $100,000 UM limit.  Rejecting the claim that a fact finder must apportion fault and damages before applying offsets, the Supreme Court affirms summary judgment for the insurer.  Guarino v. Allstate Property and Casualty Ins. Co., (January 6, 2015)

If you have a possible claim, you will need to review your options timely. For assistance, call the attorneys at Jackson O’Keefe now at (860) 278-4040.

With offices in Southington and Wethersfield, as well as satellite offices in East Haddam, Bloomfield and Farmington, our lawyers strive to meet the needs of area residents, making getting your legal services easier than ever.  Call us now to speak with us about your case.  860 278 4040

Share this:



Latest News

More Articles
best.jpg
Martindale---Hubble.jpg
SUPER-LAWYERS.jpg
BAR-REGISTER.jpg
CLM.jpg
top-attorneys-ct.jpg