The plaintiff suffered serious injury when he was thrown from his motorcycle due to an oil slick in the road left by an unidentified vehicle. He filed a claim for uninsured motorist coverage under his insurance policy and the insurer denied the claim, asserting that such benefits were available only in hit-and-run scenarios. The plaintiff brought suit against the insurer for, inter alia, breach of contract, bad faith and a CUPTA violation. The court granted the insurer’s motion to strike the bad faith and CUPTA claims, holding that the plaintiff failed to allege facts illustrating a conscious wrongdoing, dishonest purpose, or pattern of dishonest conduct. However, the court found that the plaintiff had stated a claim for breach of contract because the plain language of the insurance policy provided for coverage in situations where there was no direct physical contact between the insured and the tortfeasor vehicle. Robinshaw v. Foremost Insurance Co., CV17-6082231; Nov. 7, 2018.
- previous post: INSURANCE LITIGATION: Superior Court holds that insured stated sufficient allegations of bad faith, CUIPA and CUTPA violations against her insurer
- next post: INSURANCE LITIGATION: Appellate Court holds umbrella policy not invalidated where insured fails to maintain requisite level of underlying coverage