fbpx
skip to Main Content

DEFAMATION & MALICIOUS PROSECUTION: Complaints to police held privileged

DEFAMATION & MALICIOUS PROSECUTION: Complaints To Police Held Privileged

The Connecticut Superior Court holds that complaints to the police were privileged and therefore could not provide a basis for a defamation or malicious prosecution claim.

In a court trial, the court holds that a malicious prosecution action cannot lie with the sole conduct alleged as the defendant’s communication of potentially incriminating information to a public officer.  The defendant did not insist that the plaintiff be prosecuted or bring pressure for a prosecution.  Statements to the police were also considered to be privileged with regard to a defamation claim as statements of a complaining witness.

Silano v. Cooney, CV14-6045374 (2/22/17 Hartmere, JTR)

Interested in more information?
Contact us now for experienced and professional legal counsel.

This is Attorney Advertising. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.