skip to Main Content

DEFECTIVE PRODUCT LAW: Connecticut Supreme Court rejects adoption of Restatement (Third) test for product liability

DEFECTIVE PRODUCT LAW: Connecticut Supreme Court Rejects Adoption Of Restatement (Third) Test For Product Liability

A majority of the Connecticut Supreme Court affirms its allegiance to Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which sets forth a modified consumer expectation test known as the “risk-utility” test for determining whether a product is “defective”.

The Supreme Court rejects the Restatement (Third) of Torts, which the court said would immunize certain classes of products, including novel products, for which no alternative design existed at the time of manufacture.

Biflock v. Philip Morris, SC 19310 (12/29/16)

Interested in more information?
Contact us now for experienced and professional legal counsel.

This is Attorney Advertising. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.